Most managers today dislike the performance appraisal process and view it as an annual, traditional, time-consuming, burdensome, counterproductive, and a painful practice where they only spend a small amount of time at the end of the year collecting employee information and filling out appraisal forms. Reasons include the inconsistency in using performance appraisals within the organization, the ambiguity in distinguishing among the different levels of performance, and the poor linkage between the appraisal system and the need to develop better skills and competencies for employees. Yet what these managers don’t know is that performance appraisal when properly conducted is considered invaluable to the organization since it builds up employee objectives, links them to the corporate and strategic goals, identifies employee strengths and weaknesses, and legally explains to an employee how HR decisions were taken. For more information on how to strengthen the performance appraisal process and strategically link it with employee training and development, check out my article Linking Performance Appraisal to Training And Development: Case Study Example.
Posts Tagged ‘promes’
June 2nd, 2013 No comments
Categories: Human Resource Management
actual cost agile availability avoidance bac backward pass balanced scorecard bias budget at completion calculation case study change communication congruence cosgel cost critical path decision making development earned value environment estimate ethics forward pass frank knight free slack google graphic rating scale heuristic hrm human resource interview jamie jamie's food revolution leadership management performance planning probability project risk schedule scrum strategy uncertainty